Legal Opinion

Cavanaugh v. Cavanaugh

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1928No. Docket No. 6357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an action on a claim against the estate of William L. Cavanaugh after rejection by the administrator.

The claim presented to the administrator was as follows: “For services rendered William L. Cavanaugh, deceased, during his life time, for which he, agreed to pay the reasonable and market value thereof, consisting of continuous day and night nursing and taking care of said decedent and other incidental work, labor and services made necessary by the illness of said decedent for a period of sixty-eight (68) weeks from June 24, 1922, to October 15, 1923, at twenty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Corato v. Estate of CoratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Robinson v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API