Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Bissell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. Dorrance Dibell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was a bill to foreclose a mortgage. The only defense relied upon was usury. On the hearing in the circuit court the defense was not sustained, and on appeal the decree was. affirmed in the Appellate Court.

It appears from the evidence, that Selina Gilmore, and her husband, David Gilmore, on the 14th day of April, 1875, executed and delivered to William Finley their promissory note for $1000, with interest at ten per cent, payable annually. This note was secured by mortgage on the premises in controversy. On the 28th day of August, 1878, no interest having been paid on the note, Finley…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haworth v. HulingIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crider v. San Antonio Real Estate, Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Blake v. YountWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Sanford v. LundquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Breed v. BairdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Bowman v. NeelyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API