Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Neely

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey County; the Hon G. W. Herdman, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The only question arising upon this record is, whether a stipulation in a promissory note providing that interest at a legal rate upon the principal sum shall fall due and be paid annually, and if not so paid shall become principal and bear interest at the same rate is a usurious contract. In the view of the counsel for the appellant such a contract is usurious and so taints the whole transaction with usury that neither simple nor compound interest can be recovered upon a note containing such an agreement.

The compound interest thus provided for can not be collected by law in this State. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Humphreys v. MortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Leonard v. Administrator of VillarsIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Peddicord v. ConnardIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Gilmore v. BissellIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. LinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API