Legal Opinion
Burke v. Fleet National Bank
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 20, 1999No. SC 16157PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this reservation is whether General Statutes § 36a-1561 prohibits a bank2 *3from charging a convenience fee to a nondepositor who uses that bank’s automated teller machine (ATM). We answer the reservation in the negative.
The stipulation reveals the following facts. The plaintiffs are John P. Burke, the banking commissioner of the state of Connecticut (commissioner), and the state of Connecticut. The defendants, Fleet National Bank (Fleet), First Union National Bank (First Union), and BankBoston, N.A. (BankBoston), are national banks that have established and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cadlerock Properties Joint Venture, L.P. v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Driscoll v. General Nutrition Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.