Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1961No. 98PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The appeals present for determination the correctness of the rulings allowing the several motions to nonsuit.

When a party’s claim of title is denied, he has the burden of proof. Chisholm v. Hall, ante 374; Jones v. Turlington, 243 N.C. 681, 92 S.E. 2d 75; Locklear v. Oxendine, 233 N.C. 710, 65 S.E. 2d 673; Mobley v. Griffin, 104 N.C. 112, where the methods of showing title are summarized. Here plaintiffs did not attempt to show a record title tracing to the soverign nor did they attempt to show title by possession. To support their claim of title, they assert they and defendants claim under a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Peveto v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Grimes v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Winstead v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Cothran v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. International Paper Company v. JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Stottlemyer v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Allen v. Conservative Hunting ClubCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API