International Paper Company v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Notwithstanding plaintiff’s allegation that it owned 4924 acres and defendants’ denial of that allegation, the parties at the trial narrowed the dispute to the question of ownership of the land specifically described in the answer.
Plaintiff, to recover, had the burden of establishing it owned this area. Unless some error was made in the trial relating to plaintiff’s title, errors, if any, with respect to defendants’ title would not seem prejudicial. Nevertheless, we have considered each of the exceptions enumerated in plaintiff’s brief.
Plaintiff contends it has established good title to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Alexander v. . GibbonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Williams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Massey v. . BelisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- Newkirk v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Beam v. KerleeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Merrick v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Midgett v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.