Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 3094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Certain rice, imported from Hong Kong, China, was entered for warehousing without the payment of duty at San Francisco, and, during the same year, was withdrawn for shipment to the island of Guam.' The collector of customs at San Francisco liquidated the withdrawal entry and assessed duty upon the rice at 2 cents per pound under paragraph 727 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The importers, appellants, protested the action of the collector, and claimed that under section 557 of said act they were entitled to export said rice without any payment of duties to the United States. The United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Woodruff v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Faber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dulien Steel Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Schnitzer Steel Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972
  5. United States v. M. Bernstein & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API