Legal Opinion

In Re Dana Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2004No. 02-1001PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Per curiam

The relator, Dana Corporation, filed a petition for writ of mandamus to challenge the trial court’s discovery ruling in the underlying asbestos litigation. The real parties in this proceeding, who consist of approximately 1,260 plaintiffs in the underlying case, sought production of Dana’s insurance policies since 1930 and also sought to learn the amount of insurance remaining under those policies. The trial court ordered Dana, the defendant in the underlying proceeding, to produce “exact duplicates of any and all commercial general liability insurance policies ... from 1930 to the present.”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. SandersonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. In Re JordenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. in Re National Lloyds Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In Re TIG Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  5. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API