Legal Opinion

in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2016No. 15-0452PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Per curiam

In this mandamus action, National Lloyds Insurance Company contends that the respondent judge abused her discretion by ordering National Lloyds to produce “all emails, reports attached to emails, and any follow-up correspondence and information” and by sanctioning National Lloyds for refusing to produce certain information. We hold that the production order is overbroad, and we therefore conditionally grant mandamus relief.

The real parties in interest (referred to here as Plaintiffs) own insurance policies with National Lloyds. Beginning in 2013, Plaintiffs began filing independent lawsuits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Texaco, Inc. v. SandersonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. in Re Sun Coast Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  3. In re Liberty Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. in Re Methodist Primary Care Group & TMH Physician Organization, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  5. In re Grecon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API