Legal Opinion
Roth v. Delano
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 7, 1949No. 24PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
The First National Bank — Detroit closed its doors in 1933 and, in its liquidation, dividends on proved claims, small in average but large in the aggregate, have remained for some years in the hands of the federal liquidators, unclaimed by their owners. Since this national banking institution was located in the State of Michigan, Attorneys General of that State have made persistent efforts at different stages of the liquidation to establish a right in the State to escheat the unclaimed dividends. Latest of these was this action, brought by the Attorney General against the Comptroller of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- First National Bank of San Jose v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Rushton v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Starr v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- STATE BY PARSONS v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- State of Arizona v. Charles A. Bowsher, in His Official Capacity as Comptroller General of the United States State of Arizona the States of Minnesota, Ohio and Florida v. Charles A. Bowsher, in His Official Capacity as Comptroller General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- People v. Franklin Nat. Bank of Franklin SquareNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.