Legal Opinion
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Moore
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 29, 1948No. 337PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
We are asked in this suit to consider the validity of the New York Abandoned Property Law as applied to policies of insurance issued for delivery in New York on the lives of residents of New York by companies incorporated in states other than New York.
Article VII of the Abandoned Property Law, headed “Unclaimed Life Insurance Funds,” was enacted in 1943. In 1944 the law was amended so as to cover insurance companies incorporated out of the state.1 Section 700 states *543that “any moneys held or owing” by life insurance companies in the following three classes of policies issued on the lives of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Francisco L. Borges, Treasurer of the State of Connecticut, and State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool v. Texas Workers' Compensation CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.