Legal Opinion
Rushton v. Schram
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1944No. 9638PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
After promulgation of the opinion in the declaratory judgment suit of Starr, Atty. Gen., v. O’Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, 6 Cir., 118 F.2d 548, in which were reviewed Act No. 238, Public Acts of 1897, and the amendments thereto, in their relation to the liquidation of the First National Bank-Detroit, the legislature of Michigan amended these laws by Act No. 170, Public Acts of 1941. While that cause was pending on petition for rehearing, the Attorney General of Michigan filed in this court notice of the 1941 amendatory act. In the state of the pleadings and of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Roth v. DelanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lucien Taliaferro and Priscilla Taliaferro v. Henrik E. Stafseth, Director of the Michigan Department of State HighwaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Starr v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Black v. DelanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.