Legal Opinion
Belen v. Dawson
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 1974No. Docket 15911PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, P. J.
This action arises out of multiple collisions which occurred on January 6, 1969 involving three motor vehicles. Plaintiff was a passenger in a van-type truck, owned by defendant Jax Kar Wash No. 5, Inc. (hereinafter Jax’s No. 5) and operated by one Sterling Lester who is not a party to this action. The other vehicles involved were a Ford automobile owned and operated by defendant Francis Dawson and a Comet automobile owned by defendant Russell Hoover. The principal question presented on appeal is whether the guest passenger proviso of MCLA 257.401; MSA 9.2101 bars recovery by plaintiff from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McGuire v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Ladner v. Vander BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Thomas v. Currier Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Collins v. RydmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Abrams v. SinonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Choate v. Landis Tool Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
- Love v. Flour Mills of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Perlmutter v. WhitneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Leon Love and James Pickett v. Flour Mills of America, a Delaware Corporation and Chickasha Cotton Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Houston General Insurance Company, Fred Donaldson v. Flour Mills of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.