Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Currier Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1938No. Docket No. 22, Calendar No. 39,756PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and a new trial were denied. Defendants appeal.

The principal question involved in this appeal is whether plaintiff, while riding in the motor vehicle at the time he sustained his injuries, was a “guest without payment for such transportation” within the meaning of 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4648. By stipulation of counsel this question was withdrawn from the consideration of the jury and the trial court found as a matter of law that plaintiff was not a gratuitous guest passenger.

Plaintiff is a building contractor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGuire v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cardinal v. ReineckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Smith v. OrmistonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Beer v. BeerOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Bade v. NiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Connett v. WingetIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Brown v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API