Legal Opinion
Smith v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 11, 2000No. 99SC133PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
I. Facts and Procedural History
On March 11, 1992, Thomas Smith, the Petitioner, was involved in an automobile accident in which he was injured. At the time of the accident, Smith possessed no-fault automobile insurance issued by Farmers Insurance Exchange and Mid-Century Insurance Company, the Respondents (hereinafter Farmers). In November 1992, Smith underwent surgery on his neck due to the injuries sustained in the accident. Farmers paid for costs related to this first surgery.
According to Smith's treating physician, the surgery was unsuccessful. The physician recommended that Smith see a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hart v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Griffin v. SW Devanney & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- U.S. West, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Zinman v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spring Creek Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Hess Bakken Inv., II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Baxter International, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Crossgrove v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kowalchik v. BrohlColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.