Legal Opinion
Zinman v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1995No. 94-15198PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
A nationwide class of Medicare beneficiaries who received or will receive lump-sum insurance settlement awards from third parties in connection with Medicare-covered injuries (beneficiaries) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). The beneficiaries sued HHS, claiming that under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395, et seq., HHS is required to reduce pro rata its recovery of conditional Medicare payments when the beneficiaries’ liability settlements are less than…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Baxter International, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Fanning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Haro v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Taransky v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.