Kowalchik v. Brohl
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE WEBB
¶ 1 In this dispute involving conservation easement (CE) tax credits, we granted the petition of defendant, Barbara Brohl, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue (DOR), for interlocutory review of the trial court's orders in favor of plaintiffs,1 holding that persons who purchased CE tax credits (transferees) from plaintiffs: are not within the statutory definition of "taxpayer" under section 39-22-522(1), C.R.S.2011; have no tax liability for deficiencies, interest, and penalties for the improper claim of a tax credit; need not be joined as…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Class v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Accetta v. Brooks Towers Residences Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Markus v. BrohlColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Medved v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Medved v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Oaster Development, LLC v. WD ConsultingDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025