Legal Opinion

Maisel v. Patrick Corr & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1923No. Appeal, No. 264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff declared on a written contract, under which he alleged defendant agreed to pay him a commission for the purchase of a warehouse property, which was acquired by it, following negotiations, in which admittedly plaintiff took part. The contract was in the form of a letter, dated March 1, 1920, addressed by defendant to plaintiff, and says: “You are hereby authorized to represent me in the purchase of premises known as Oak-dale & Trenton Avenue (A. J. Reach Warehouse). We offer you a bona fide offer of One Hundred- Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($125,000)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Dietrich v. DaviesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Rice v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Isett v. MaclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Semple v. Kramer Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Gilles v. Leas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1924
  3. Massey v. Bohn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API