Legal Opinion

Isett v. Maclay

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1919No. Appeal, No. 295PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 295, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Huntingdon Co., May T., 1917, No. 222, dismissing bill in equity in case of H. C. Isett v. Ellen C. Maclay. Bill in equity for the cancellation of a deed. Before Bailey, P. J. The court dismissed the bill. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

This bill in equity was filed to secure the cancellation of a deed on the ground of fraud. In February, 1914, Mrs. Margaret C. Isett, a childless widow, 83 years old, residing on her farm in Huntingdon County, entered into a contract with her niece, Ellen C. Maclay, a trained nurse living in Philadelphia, that the latter should give up her profession and reside with and care for the former during the balance of her life, for which Miss Maclay was to have all of Mrs. Isett’s property, including the farm, worth about $4,500 and $6,000 in personalty. All of which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Achenbach v. StoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Pringle v. PringleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Spangler Brewing Co. v. McHenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Weiskircher v. ConnellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rynier EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Campbell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Woodward & Williamson's AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API