Legal Opinion

Semple v. Kramer Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1924No. Appeal, 25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellants, husband and wife, appeal from judgment against them in assumpsit for an unpaid balance of a boarding-school obligation which the jury found was incurred by them for the education of their minor daughter. Though a number of disputed questions were settled on the merits at the trial, appellants present two for our consideration, stated in the brief as follows: “(1) Whether a joint action can be maintained against husband and wife upon a contract signed in New York City in the State of New York by the wife in •her own name,......”

“(2) The place of performance and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanley v. WaxmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Bayuk Bros. Inc. v. Wilson Martin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Bennett v. Cadwell'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Van Auken v. DunningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  5. Maisel v. Patrick Corr & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Breintall's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1936
  3. Somers v. Hildenbrand, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API