Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 2003No. COA02-440PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In this appeal, we are constrained to hold under North Carolina law, the trial court erred by entering three judgments on habitual felony status, and sentencing defendant consecutively upon that status alone. See State v. Patton, 342 N.C. 633, 466 S.E.2d 708 (1996). Accordingly, we vacate the judgments .entered by the trial court purporting to sentence defendant on obtaining the status of habitual felon.

The underlying facts on appeal show that on 23 March 2001, defendant pled guilty to ten counts of obtaining property by false pretenses, six counts of felonious breaking and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. WestbrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. GellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. LinemannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. MohamedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Real Time ResolutionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API