Legal Opinion

State v. Linemann

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1999No. COA98-1515PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Walter Linemann (“defendant”) appeals the order of the superior court wherein it granted the State’s motion for appropriate relief. We vacate on the basis that the superior court did not have jurisdiction.

First, we note that defendant does not have a right to appeal from the order of the superior court to this Court. Article 91 of the North Carolina General Statutes, entitled “Appeal to Appellate Division,” indicates when a defendant in a criminal action may appeal to the appellate division. It provides that “[t]he ruling of the court upon a motion for appropriate relief is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Spalding Division of Questor Corp. v. DuBoseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Phil Mechanic Construction Co. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Sarda v. City/County of Durham Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API