Legal Opinion

State v. Mohamed

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 2010No. COA09-943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Defendant Ahmed Babiker Ibrahi Mohamed appeals his convictions for robbery with a dangerous weapon and obtaining property by false pretenses on the grounds that (1) his confession was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights against compulsory self-incrimination, (2) he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel, (3) the interpreters utilized at his trial were inadequate, (4) his guilty plea to obtaining property by false pretenses was unlawfully accepted, (5) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his involvement in another robbery, and (6) the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API