Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1964No. Cong. No. 2-58PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaeamoee, Judge

Through this congressional reference1 we are asked to pass upon plaintiffs’2 claim against the United States for *109losses arising out of certain shipments of potatoes made in 1956 by plaintiffs to Swedish purchasers. Plaintiffs’ claim is premised on an alleged misrepresentation by an agent of the United States that the potato shipments in question would meet the import requirements of the Kingdom of Sweden. Specifically, plaintiffs allege that the Chief Staff Officer of the Plant Quarantine División, Agriculture Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, failed to inform…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Burkhardt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Estate of Fairbank ex rel. Fairbank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Georgia Kaolin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. Mike Mizokami, Sam Mizokami, Tom Mizokami, and Hatsuyo Mizokami v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Spalding & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Lance Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API