Legal Opinion

Mike Mizokami, Sam Mizokami, Tom Mizokami, and Hatsuyo Mizokami v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1969No. 5-65PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was referred to Chief Commissioner Marion T. Bennett with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 57(a). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on November 29, 1968. Exceptions to the commissioner’s findings of fact and recommended conclusion of law were filed by the parties and the case has been submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties.

The court is in agreement with the opinion, findings and recommended conclusion of law of the commissioner…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Clyde Fitch and Sharon Fitch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Land v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API