Estate of Fairbank ex rel. Fairbank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
Through this Congressional reference1 we are asked to pass upon still another phase in a continuing dispute over a famous tract of land — Section 36, Township 30 South, Range 23 East, in the Elk Hills of Southern California — a dispute which has remained alive for three generations. As before, the controversy centers on the issue of whether Section 36, which is now concededly oil-bearing, was known to be mineral land in January 1903.
The problem arose because Congress, in the Act of March 3, 1853, 10 Stat. 244, 246, granted to the then new State…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Deffeback v. HawkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Citizen Band of Potawatomi Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Estates of Armiger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- O'Donnell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Ralph Feffer & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.