Frazier v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REX D. DAVIS, Chief Justice.
Rashard Lamod Frazier pleaded guilty before a jury to two counts of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(2) (Vernon 1994). The jury assessed his punishment at twenty-five years’ imprisonment on each count. Because the offenses arose from the same criminal episode, the sentences run concurrently. Id. § 3.03 (Vernon Supp.2000). Frazier claims in three points that the court erred by: (1) failing to instruct the jury in the charge that it could not consider any extraneous crimes or bad acts shown by the evidence to have been committed by him…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Stephenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Ellison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- State v. Woodrow John GrantIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.