Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex Parte Perry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 1999No. 1970370Published

1Concurrence

The trial court properly determined the preliminary issue of arbitrability, because the contract did not very clearly grant to an arbitrator the power to decide the preliminary issue of arbitrability. SeeFirst Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995);Allstar Homes, Inc. v. Waters, 711 So.2d 924 (Ala. 1997); Ex parte Williams,686 So.2d 1110, 1112 (Ala. 1996) (Houston, J., concurring in the result). Furthermore, Mrs. Perry specifically challenged the enforceability of the arbitration provision on fraud grounds; therefore, even if the arbitration provision had clearly stated that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Ex Parte NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Boyd v. Homes of Legend, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  5. Wilson v. Waverlee Homes, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API