Legal Opinion
Cooey v. Kasich
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 8, 2011No. Case 2:04-cv-1156, 2:09-cv-242, 2:09-cv-823, 2:10-cv-27PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
It is the policy of the State of Ohio that the State follows its written execution protocol, except when it does not. This is nonsense.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff Kenneth Smith’s motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 908), Defendants’ memorandum in opposition (ECF No. 920), Plaintiffs reply memorandum (ECF No. 923), Defendants’ incorporated motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 919), Plaintiffs incorporated summary judgment memorandum in opposition (ECF No. 925), and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- David Zink v. George LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Arthur v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Valle v. SingerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.