Legal Opinion
In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 26, 2017No. Case No. 2:11-cv-1016PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Michael R. Merz, United States Magistrate Judge
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
This consolidated case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is brought by Ohio inmates under a sentence of death and seeks relief from a number of asserted constitutional deficiencies in Ohio’s new lethal injection protocol adopted October 7,2016.
The above-named inmates and the State of Ohio unanimously consented to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction over their cases (ECF No. 732) and Chief Judge Sargus referred these three cases on that basis (ECF No.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Jack Jones, Jr. v. Wendy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.