Legal Opinion

Burlage v. Lefebure Corp.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1940No. 30701PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation law. Comp. St. 1929, sec. 48-101. Elizabeth Burlage, dependent widow of the employee, Walter W. Burlage, is plaintiff. The defendants are the employer, Lefebure Corporation, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and the latter’s insurance carrier, Iowa Mutual Liability Insurance Company. The employee was a traveling salesman of general office supplies under the contract with the employer, hereinafter called “Corporation,” and was required to furnish his own automobile in the performance of his duties and to operate it ■at his own expense. His average…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porter v. Brinn-Jensen Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Brammer v. Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Hunter v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Simon v. Standard Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API