Legal Opinion
Société Vinicole De Champagne v. Mumm Champagne & Importation Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My decision herein is in favor of the plaintiff, which will have an interlocutory decree carrying costs and giving the relief hereinafter indicated.
I. This cause, which involves questions of infringement of trade-mark and of unfair competition, is now before me on final hearing.
The subject-matter jurisdiction of, this court herein is based, in so far as questions of trade-mark are involved, on the Trade Mark Act, § 17, title 15, United States Code, § 97 (15 U.S.C.A. § 97), and, in 'so far as questions of unfair competition are involved, on the fact that it involves far…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Smith v. . United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Societe Vinicole De Champagne v. Mumm Champagne & Importation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
- Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Orenstein & Koppel AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John Zwack, Bela Zwack and Dora Zwack, as Co-Partners Doing Business as J. Zwack & Company v. Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, SA v. BrushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Browne-Vintners Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- E. Leitz, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
- GH Mumm Champagne v. Eastern Wine CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.