Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 12, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is in all respects denied.

I. The motion here involved, which was argued on March 3d last, is made under somewhat unusual circumstances, and involves two points of more than passing interest. Por that reason I reserved decision on it, and have given it my most careful consideration since the argument.

II. The procedural background of this motion is as follows:

On September 8, 1932, the federal grand jury brought in two indictments against James J. Davis, Raymond Walsh, Theodore G. Miller, and Bernard C. McGuire.

The first indictment — criminal docket No. 89 —…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Balch v. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Reed v. Proprietors of Locks and Canals on Merrimac RiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Continental Turpentine & Rosin Co. v. Gulp Naval Stores Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Basevi v. Edward O'Toole Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API