Legal Opinion
GH Mumm Champagne v. Eastern Wine Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 14, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
This action is for trademark infringement and unfair competition; the relief sought is an injunction, an accounting, and damages.
Cross motions for summary judgment present, as the chief issues, (1) capacity to sue; (2) infringement, and (3) unfair competition.
G. H. Mumm Champagne (Societe Vinicole de Champagne, Successors) and Associates, Incorporated, hereinafter called Importer, is a Delaware corporation having a place of business within this district.
Societe Vinicole de Champagne, hereinafter called Producer, is a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Société Vinicole De Champagne v. Mumm Champagne & Importation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Societe Vinicole De Champagne v. Mumm Champagne & Importation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Dep Corporation v. Interstate Cigar Company, Inc. And L. S. Amster & Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- R. E. Peckham, Assignee and Trustee, Etc. v. Family Loan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Havana Club Holding v. GalleonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- G. H. Mumm Champagne v. Eastern Wine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944