Legal Opinion
Huff v. Spaw
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided January 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-212-DLB-JGWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*726 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This case arises from an all-too-familiar and embarrassing situation that most individuals with cell phones have experienced at some point: the “pocket” or “butt” dial. James Huff inadvertently called — or “pocket dialed” — Carol Spaw while he was on a business trip in Italy. Unbeknownst to Mr. Huff, Ms. Spaw listened in for 91 minutes to face-to-face conversations that Mr. Huff had with a colleague and his wife. Ms. Spaw recorded and transcribed a portion of those conversations. James and Bertha Huff have now…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Jessie Walker v. Thomas E. Darby, Hugh L. Robinson, Jr., and Kenneth DayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick, Inc., Cadillac Brick Co., and Century Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Tumblebus Inc. v. Meredith Cranmer, D/B/A Tumblebus of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Darlie Kee Darin Routier v. City of Rowlett Texas Jimmy Ray Patterson Chris Frosch Greg Davis, Assistant District Attorney for Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bertha Huff v. Carol SpawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Elizabeth Dietenberger v. Dominick MarcottCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
- HLV, LLC v. Page & StewartDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018