Bertha Huff v. Carol Spaw
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to consider whether a person who listens to and subsequently electronically records a conversation from an inadvertent “pocket-dial” call 1 violates Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. (Title III). James Huff inadvertently placed a pocket-dial call to Carol Spaw while he was on a business trip in Italy. Spaw stayed on the line for 91 minutes and listened to face-to-face conversations that James Huff had with Larry Savage, James’s colleague, and with Bertha Huff, James’s wife. Spaw…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In the Matter of the Application of the State of NewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- Brodrick Michael James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In re Search Warrant Issued to Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
- State v. NettlesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Brodrick Michael James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.