Legal Opinion

People v. Kinowaki

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1940No. Crim. 3266PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Defendants were charged in count I of the information with the crime of murder and in count II with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. A jury found them guilty of manslaughter and not guilty of the charge contained in count II. They prosecute the present appeal from the judgments of conviction and from the orders denying their motions for a new trial.

At about 9 :00 o ’clock P. M. on May 21, 1938, Teruhiko Namba entered the gambling establishment in Los Angeles of which defendant Tamatoda was manager. A fight then occurred which, according to the charges of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. People v. NewcomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. McClainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. OroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. MessersmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. HatchettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. RayolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Pueblo v. González RománSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  5. People v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API