Legal Opinion

People v. Messersmith

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1882No. 10,692PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court. The Court instructed the jury as stated in the last paragraph of the syllabus.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

On this appeal it is contended, on behalf of the appellant, that he has not had a fair and impartial trial, because of errors of law committed by the Court below in the charge to the jury. Three instructions given to the jury are challenged: By one of them the jury were told, “That a tendency to commit suicide does not prove insanity, but it is one of the symp*248toms of insanity which it is entirely competent for the jury to take into consideration with all the other symptoms which have been proved, and with all the facts and circumstances of the case;” and by another, “That the burden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. People v. YbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. People v. FerrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Walker v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Hughes v. MontySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API