Legal Opinion
Ainbinder v. Potter
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 19, 2003No. 03 Civ. 1383(JGK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Robert Ainbinder (“Ain-binder”) and Robert Barra (“Barra”) have sued the defendants, Robert Potter (“Potter”) and Tri-Star Coal Sale, Inc. (“TriStar”), for damages allegedly arising out of a mining project in Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs assert three causes of action. The first claim alleges that the defendants breached the terms of a settlement agreement. The second claim is for unjust enrichment. The third claim alleges fraud and unjust enrichment.
The defendants have now moved to dismiss the Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Neil Bros. Ltd. v. World Wide Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fairbanks Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Excelsior Designs, Inc. v. SheresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. Kwik Lok Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.