Legal Opinion

Waters v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2004No. 25672PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

Robert E. Waters (movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion directed to his conviction for possession of crack cocaine, a controlled substance. See § 195.202, RSMo 2000. Following conviction based on a plea of guilty and incarceration, movant filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief as permitted by Rule 24.035. An attorney entered an appearance and an amended motion was filed asserting ineffective assistance of trial counsel. A hearing was held and the amended motion denied. This court affirms.

Appellate review of the denial of a post-conviction motion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Vernor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Gawne v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Rhodes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Franklin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API