Legal Opinion

Gawne v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1987No. WD 38595PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is a direct appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 27.26. The judgment is affirmed in part, but the cause is remanded with directions to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Movant presents two points on appeal: (1) his guilty plea was rendered involuntary by ineffective assistance of counsel, and (2) the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were insufficient.

The pertinent facts are as follows: Mov-ant’s conviction for witness tampering was connected with a separate charge of rape. The witness tampering charge was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Laws v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. McCoy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Barry v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Jenkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Fairley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API