United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Pruitt Ex Rel. Pruitt
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court bifurcated this case, addressing separately the coverage and damages issues before it, and eventually awarded separate attorney's fees for each part. The questions presented are whether separate awards were appropriate and whether the amounts awarded were justified. We answer the first question in the affirmative, but vacate the award as to one part of the case because the court did not explain its reasons for deviating from the presumptive award prescribed by Alaska Civil Rule 82(b)(1).
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Sean Pruitt ("Pruitt")…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. FroinesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.