Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Chapman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1919No. Civ. No. 2926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The plaintiff, Dodge, executed a lease of a rooming-house property to one Plevros. The lessee was not privileged to assign without lessor’s written consent. An agreement was made whereby plaintiff consented to an assignment negotiated by Plevros to the defendants, Chas. D. Chapman and Anna E. Chapman, husband and wife, on condition that the Chapmans furnish a bond in the penal sum of three thousand dollars for their faithful performance of the conditions of the lease. The Chapmans furnished such bond, with themselves as principals, and the defendants, J. W. Chapman and W. D. Altenburg, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stroud v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Tuohy v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sinnige v. OswaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Halliday v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Driscoll v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stoltenberg v. HarvestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wayland v. LathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Callaghan v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API