City of Woodland v. Leech
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. N. A. Hawkins, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll. The defendant Leech was not served and did not appear at the trial. He was elected marshal of the city of Woodland, a municipal corporation of the fifth class, and the respondents signed his official bond containing the following condition: “Now, therefore, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the said S. A. Leech shall well and faithfully perform all official duties now required of him by law, and shall well and faithfully execute and perform all the duties of marshal and ex officio superintendent of streets required by any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Farrell v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- De Merritt v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- County of El Dorado v. MeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Cleland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- County of Marin v. DufficyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Evans v. Zions Bancorporation, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2019