Legal Opinion

Gendreau v. Tri-Community Recycling

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 26, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

[¶ 1] The employee, Alfred Gendreau, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting his petition for restoration, but permitting the employer a credit in the amount of sick leave payments received by the employee during his period of incapacity. Because we agree with the Board that the employer’s sick leave policy in this case constitutes a “wage continuation plan” that may be offset against workers’ compensation benefits, we affirm the decision of the Board.

[¶ 2] Gendreau suffered a work-related neck-injury on November 10,1991, while employed at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Berry v. H.R. Beal & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Tee-Pak, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. YUSTIN v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Goff v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Daley v. Spinnaker Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1999
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API