Legal Opinion

Berry v. H.R. Beal & Sons

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 9, 1994PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

Thurman Berry appeals from a decision of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, which affirmed the Commissioner’s decision that, pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 62-B (1989), 1 the employer’s insurer was entitled to reduce Berry’s workers’ compensation benefits by an amount equal to fifty percent of his social security retirement benefits. Berry argues that (1) the application of section 62-B violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Maine and federal constitutions and (2) the employer’s insurer is not entitled to the entire offset because one of the injuries…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Beaulieu v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Peters v. SaftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Vogel v. Wells Fargo Guard ServicesTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Golden v. Westark Community CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Tobin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. McDowell v. Jackson Energy RECCKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API