Legal Opinion

Claude v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1993No. C0-93-564, C5-93-642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Respondent James R. Collins and appellants Ray Sogard and Frank Modich challenge the trial court’s finding that they violated the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn.Stat. § 471.705 (1990). Respondents Larry Claude, George Galatz, and Ed Jylha claim the trial court incorrectly calculated the number of violations of the law and further erred by failing to remove Collins, So-gard, Modich, and respondent Steven Saban from office. We affirm.

FACTS

Collins, Sogard, Saban, and Modich (coun-cilmembers) are members of the Hibbing City Council. Collins is also mayor of the city.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Head v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claude v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & TCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API