Legal Opinion
Claude v. Collins
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1994No. C0-93-564, C5-93-562PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This is an action brought under Minnesota’s Open Meeting Law, Minn.Stat. § 471.-705, subd. 1 (1992). The Open Meeting Law requires public business be transacted in open meetings. 1 Subdivision la permits meetings to be closed for labor negotiations, provided public notice is given, 2 and subdivision ld(e) permits meetings to be closed for discussions of matters within the attorney-client privilege. We are asked to decide whether the Open Meeting Law 3 constitutionally mandates removal of elected officials under the facts of this case.
In May 1992, four citizens of the City…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lott v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Jacobsen v. NagelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Steffen v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Brown v. Cannon Falls TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & TCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Rupp v. MayasichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.