Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 13, 2009No. A08-0382PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLLINS, Judge. *
Relator AT & T Communications of the Midwest, Inc. (AT & T) challenges the determination by respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) that (1) switched-access services are local services and thus are not exempt from the provisions of chapter 237; (2) AT & T knowingly and intentionally violated state filing and anti-discrimination requirements; and (3) Minn.Stat. § 237.462 (2004), under which the MPUC imposed penalties for these violations, had expired but was saved by the general saving statute. AT & T also contends that the MPUC’s penalty decision was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Excelsior Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Munson Earth Moving Corp. v. City of South BurlingtonVermont Superior Court · 2010