Legal Opinion

United States v. Vigneaux

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 6, 1923No. 3500PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The defendant in this case, having been indicted for the illegal possession of intoxicating liquors, filed a motion to exclude at his trial evidence secured on a search warrant. The warrant was held to be bad and the search and seizure unauthorized. The evidence therefore was excluded, and, there being no other evidence to support the charges, a verdict of not guilty was returned by order of the court.

The premises searched was a dwelling house, used as such by the defendant, and the officer making the search seized a quantity of liquor found on the premises. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  5. United States v. SlusserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Voorhies v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  2. Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Dickhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  4. Castro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  5. Geraghty v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API